RSS | Advanced Search | Site Map | Text Size a- A+
City of Colorado Springs
We Create Community

NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.

 System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.

EASTERN COLORADO BANK SUITE 100
00444 PIKES PEAK AVE

Review DateStatusComment(s)
4/3/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Eastern Colorado Bank, 444 E Pikes Peak Ave Suite 100, Interior Remodel - ELECTRONIC REVIEW This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
FYIREVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department plan reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirements are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether or not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the adopted fire code requirements, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)"
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments: 1. REMOTE LED INDICATORS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ABOVE CEILING PENDENT DETECTORS. 2. SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES WITH BATTERY CALCS. a) DEVICE CURRENT DRAWS DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN. REVIEW AND MAKE SURE TO HIGHLIGHT PROPER INFO ON CUT SHEETS. DOUBLE CHECK INFO ON CALCS TO CUT-SHEETS. b) STANDBY TIME SHOWN AS 96 HOURS. WHY? Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
FYICORRECTIONS All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provide submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax, email or verbally.
AttentionTHE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.
FYIRTP REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Roland Peterson Senior Fire Inspector, CSFD 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7369 rpeterson@springsgov.com
3/12/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Eastern Colorado Bank, 444 E Pikes Peak Ave Suite 100, Interior Remodel This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
FYI*****DESIGNER/INSTALLER INFORMATION Fire Alarm system was designed by: ESI Fire alarm system is being installed by: Special Systems
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments: 1. REMOTE LED INDICATORS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ABOVE CEILING PENDENT DETECTORS. 2. SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES WITH BATTERY CALCS. a) DEVICE CURRENT DRAWS DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN. REVIEW AND MAKE SURE TO HIGHLIGHT PROPER INFO ON CUT SHEETS. DOUBLE CHECK INFO ON CALCS TO CUT-SHEETS. b) STANDBY TIME SHOWN AS 96 HOURS. WHY? PLANS EVEN INDICATE BATTERIES SELECTED ARE NOT A BIG ENOUGH SIZE. PLEASE RE-EVALUATE ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED AND RE-SUBMIT. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
FYICORRECTIONS All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provide submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax, email or verbally.
AttentionTHE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.
FYI***** DISAPPROVED ITEMS ADDRESSED The plans have been resubmitted and all the disapproved comments have been addressed and/or corrected as follows: 1. Numerous devices are shown as existing, but they are mounted on new walls. These devices ust be marked as relocated devices. DEVICES RELOCATED 2. Provide notification in Men's Restroom 112. PROVIDED 3. IT Room 116 appears to be a group work area exceeding 100 sq ft. Why isn't notification provided in this room? PROVIDED 4. Clarify the smoke detectors with relays shown on your plans. What are detecdtors protecting? What is the relay module controling? Are these duct detectors? If not provide code reference from NFPA 72 for specific protection criteria since you are not providing detection throughout. If these are duct detectors, show this in your sequence of operation and show remote test switches. PENDENT SMOKE DETECTORS. REMOTE LEDS REQUIRED 5. Your plans show an existing elevator, but elevator recall is not called out in your sequence of operation. Why? ELEVATOR RECALL SHOWN IN MATRIX 6. Provide CSFD Plan Review number on your plans. PROVIDED
FYIJAH REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Jeff Hanenberg Senior Fire Code Inspector 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7359 jeff.hanenberg@coloradosprings.gov
2/11/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Eastern Colorado Bank, 444 E Pikes Peak Ave Suite 100, Interior Remodel This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments: 1. Numerous devices are shown as existing, but they are mounted on new walls. These devices ust be marked as relocated devices. 2. Provide notification in Men's Restroom 112. 3. IT Room 116 appears to be a group work area exceeding 100 sq ft. Why isn't notification provided in this room? 4. Clarify the smoke detectors with relays shown on your plans. What are detecdtors protecting? What is the relay module controling? Are these duct detectors? If not provide code reference from NFPA 72 for specific protection criteria since you are not providing detection throughout. If these are duct detectors, show this in your sequence of operation and show remote test switches. 5. Your plans show an existing elevator, but elevator recall is not called out in your sequence of operation. Why? 6. Provide CSFD Plan Review number on your plans. 7. Use the new permit application form on CSFD's website. 8. Review stopped. No review of battery or voltage drop calcs has been performed. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
FYICORRECTIONS All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provide submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax, email or verbally.
AttentionTHE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.
FYICLT REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Wyman "Chip" Taylor II, PE Fire Protection Engineer I Colorado Springs Fire Department Division of the Fire Marshal 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7303 wtaylor@springsgov.com
1/6/2020 FYI***** WORK AT RISK On --1/6/2020--- approval was granted by --FPE WITHEE--- for work to begin by --SPECIAL SYSTEMS DESIGN---without approved plans or permits. Any changes or modifications based upon plan review will be required to be completed. No inspections will be conducted without approved plans and permits.


 

Contact Us: Email Us - Call: 385-CITY (719-385-2489) - RSS - Privacy, Linking and ADA Policies - designed, developed by projecta.com

printer friendly version Printer friendly version