RSS | Advanced Search | Site Map | Text Size a- A+
City of Colorado Springs
We Create Community

NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.

 System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.

SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER MEDICAL OFFICE BLDG D
06031 WOODMEN RD

Review DateStatusComment(s)
5/18/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Saint Francis Medical Center Medical Office Building D, 6031 E Woodmen Road, New Office Building This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) The fire sprinkler system is being installed by: Arapahoe Fire Protection CSFD does not allow any combustibles into a building until a sprinkler system has passed it's final acceptance test performed by CSFD Inspector's.
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA: Type of System: NFPA 13 Wet & Dry, NFPA 14 Wet Manual Standpipe Type of head (s): 5.6K QR Pend, UR Dry Pend Design Criteria: .15 &.20/1500 Adjustments:33% QR Reduction for wet; 30% increase for dry
FYI*****ADDITIONAL FEES: This is our ---3--, review of these plans. Any and all future plan submittals for this specific permit will have additional plan review fees charged to the project, as per the approved fee schedule.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) FLEXIBLE SPRINKLER CONNECTIONS AND HEAT TRACE: Flex Connections: NO Heat Trace:NO 4" standpipe feed to north stariwell is being routed through conditioned ceiling space where it runs through parking garage.
Approved/Corrected*****(STANDARD COMMENT) RED-LINED COMMENTS The following RED-LINED items are to be corrected prior to final inspection: 1. Correct length of 6" underground in your calcs. Plans show 45' where there is only 27'-6" in calculations.
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: The FDC will have ----3- 2 1/2" inlets connected to the system by a -6---- pipe. The plans indicate the FDC is being installed ---NE Corner-- of the building.
FYI*****(STANDPIPES) DESIGN INFORMATION: -----Automatic --XX---Manual -XX----Wet -----Dry Hose Connection Location: -----Main Floor Landing -XX----Intermediate Floor Landing -----Protected Vestibule Number of Standpipes: -2---- Demand of --750--- gpm, at --160.2--- psi is needed at the FDC.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) LICENSED INSTALLER/SERVICE TECHNICIAN An On-Site Installer/Service TechniciaN shall supervise all on-site work on any fire protection system. This On-Site Installer shall have a current Installer Certificate (RBD Wallet Card), on his/her person, while on the job site.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CONCEALED SPACES - This plan did not provide any information on combustible concealed spaces. NFPA 13 requires that "All concealed spaces enclosed wholly or partially by exposed combustible construction shall be protected by sprinklers". There are several specific allowances to this section that allow for the omission of sprinklers. If there are combustible concealed areas found during the installation of the system that do not meet the requirements of the NFPA 13, then these areas will be required to be sprinkled. (NFPA 13:8.15.1) IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SYSTEM IS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) FREEZING CONDITIONS It is the designer's responsibility to provide the building owner with a system design that will continue to function reliably even under adverse temperature conditions. The sprinkler contractor must be conscious of field conditions that may affect the performance of their system, such as drafts, disturbed insulation, installation along exterior walls, etc. and incorporate such conditions into a reliable design.
Attention(STANDARD COMMENT) CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION: It is the installer's responsibility to certify through this form (attached to the plans) that the system has been properly installed and tested. NOTE! CSFD will no longer be providing these forms as they are now available online at: https://coloradosprings.gov/sites/default/files/inline-images/installer_certificaiton.xlsx The form is to be filled out in its entirety PRIOR TO THE ARRIVAL OF THE FIRE INSPECTOR conducting the final inspection and/or acceptance test of the system. FINAL INSPECTIONS WILL NOT BE CONDUCTED WITHOUT THIS FORM BEING COMPLETED.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) AS-BUILT PLANS All deviations from approved plans shall be documented and submitted to CSFD for archival. Reviews will not be conducted on as-builts, as these field changes are often verified as compliant by the fire inspectors. All as-built plans shall be conspicuously marked as such. Any changes requiring approval prior to Final shall be submitted as a REVISION.
Attention*****(STANDARD COMMENT) SCHEDULING INSPECTIONS Please call 719-385-5982 Extension 2 to schedule all construction related inspection activities. Due to the dynamic nature of inspectors schedules, PLEASE call your inspection requests in with ample time to allow scheduling. When calling, please have your complete CSFD plan review number(s) ready for each inspection request. ( i.e. 2013-1234 - HS-1) The CSFD Approved sets of plans are to be on site for all inspections.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) ROUGH VISUAL INSPECTIONS: Rough Visual inspections shall be completed PRIOR TO any bucket tests or final inspections.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CONCEALED WORK: The fire sprinkler piping shall not be covered up by walls, sheetrock, ceiling tiles, etc... prior to the CSFD visual inspections of the piping. If the piping is covered, and the inspectors cannot inspect it as is required by Fire Code, the walls,sheetrock, ceiling tiles, etc... will be required to be removed. If this means that finished ceilings will need to be removed, this will be required to be done! (IFC 106.3)
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) PLAN REVIEW/PERMIT FEES: All fire department fees are to be paid prior to issuance of any permits. These fees must be paid directly to the Colorado Springs Fire Department - Development Review Enterprise - at 2880 International Circle - Suite 200-7.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2003 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CLT REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Wyman "Chip" Taylor II, PE Fire Protection Engineer I 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7303 wtaylor@springsgov.com
5/6/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Saint Francis Medical Center Medical Office Building D, 6031 E Woodmen Road, This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) The fire sprinkler system is being installed by: ARAPAHOE CSFD does not allow any combustibles into a building until a sprinkler system has passed it's final acceptance test performed by CSFD Inspector's.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS: Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents. The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2003 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code. (105.4.4)
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) DEW REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Doreen "Dee" Withee, PE Fire Protection Engineer II, CSFD 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7361 dwithee@springsgov.com
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments: 1. Standpipe has been provided however hose valves shall be located on intermediate landings - reference 2015 IFc 905.4. 2.Plans show Derringer DC20X backflow however, you provided cut sheets for a Colt 200. Reconcile documents. 3. CSU backflow approval form still has not been provided as required by previous reviewer. 4. 2nd and 3rd floors have overspaced heads in same locations - reference plans for specifics. 5. Hydraulics show 25-feet of equivalent length for flex sprinkler connections, however the plans and cut sheets show 46-feet for the specifed model, length. Reconcile documents. NOTE: ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS SHALL BE UNLOCKED AND UNRESTRICTED TO ALLOW CSFD REVIEW STAFF TO FLATTEN THE IMAGES AFTER REVIEW TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF OUR STAMPS. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
Attention(STANDARD COMMENT) THE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CORRECTIONS All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provide submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax, email or verbally.
4/13/2020 FYI*****(STANDARD COMMENT) This project is: Saint Francis Medical Center Medical Office Building D, 6031 E Woodmen Road, New Office Building This plan review is based on the requirements found within the adopted Editions of the International Building Code, International Fire Code and the related Standards.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CLT REVIEWER CONTACT: If you have any specific questions or concerns about these comments, please feel free to contact me at: Wyman "Chip" Taylor II, PE Fire Protection Engineer I 2880 International Circle, Suite 200-7 Colorado Springs, CO 80910 (T) 719-385-7303 wtaylor@springsgov.com
Disapproved*****(STANDARD COMMENT) DISAPPROVED COMMENTS The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review. Please respond, in writing on letterhead, to each of the following comments: 1. CSU Fire Flow Report and Map must be provided. 2. CSU Backflow submittal form must be provided. 3. Hydraulic calculations must extend to the point where the water supply is known per NFPA 13, 27.2.1.6. This is the point of connection of the test hydrant. 4. Standpipes are required in the building per IFC 905. Provide full standpipe submittal per NFPA 14. 5. Sprinkler heads in Water Entry room are oversapced (130 sq ft max spacing per NFPA 13, A.4.3.3). 6. Call out the use of parking garge on garden level along with type and height of ceiling 7. Garden Level: sprinkler heads are overspaced off wall along column line 7. 8. Provide documentation that crawlspace meets NFPA 9.2.2 to not require fire sprinklers. 9. Proovide volume of dry system. 10. Core/shell buildings are to be designed to OH II per CSDF Sprinkelr Guidance Docuement. 11. 2nd Floor corridor: west sprinkler head is overspaced off of wall. 12. Floor control valve assembly requires check valve for combination sprinkler/standpipe system. 13. Review stopped. No revewi of hydraulic calculations has been performed. Also review the disapproved plans for additional written comments prior to submittal of new plans.
Attention(STANDARD COMMENT) THE DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSITITUE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. It is the responsibility of the design professional to conduct a complete re-review of the plans for additional violations of the adopted codes/standards and incorrect information prior to resubmitting.
FYI(STANDARD COMMENT) CORRECTIONS All corrections and comments are to be submitted back to CSFD in writing, or provide submittal sheets/drawings, etc as requested, to complete the review. Corrections are not accepted over the phone, via fax, email or verbally.


 

Contact Us: Email Us - Call: 385-CITY (719-385-2489) - RSS - Privacy, Linking and ADA Policies - designed, developed by projecta.com

printer friendly version Printer friendly version